|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277 |
Yes. I'd use one way past 250, and I wouldn't use a barnes...ever
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 08/14/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,804
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,804 |
ABSOFRIGGINLUTELY
I have taken an awful lot of deer and hogs with it out to 250. It runs out of steam further out... You can kill a deer (or hog) with just about any caliber as long as YOU make the correct shot placement.
NO BULLET or CALIBER will make up for a poorly placed shot.
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they went" Will Rogers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 76,890
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 76,890 |
Yes.
@ingwe. Load and bullet used in the .222? A friend just picked one up. Thanks. That was a 45 gr Barnes TSX and 24 gr of 748 IIRC...
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,273
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,273 |
ABSOFRIGGINLUTELY
I have taken an awful lot of deer and hogs with it out to 250. It runs out of steam further out... You can kill a deer (or hog) with just about any caliber as long as YOU make the correct shot placement.
NO BULLET or CALIBER will make up for a poorly placed shot. My fellow South Carolinian is correct. The first deer I killed with a rifle, in 1967 was drt at 200 yards with a Norma 50 grain factory loaded.222. The most recent deer I killed with a 22Cf was a large wt buck at 275 -300 yards with a 65 grain SGK. It’s not what you shoot them with, it’s how you shoot them. I am not so desperate to kill an animal that I blast away with Hail Mary shots at running deer in the woods. I’ve seen plenty of deer wounded and lost by those who do, usually excited kids shooting too much rifle. Just about any reasonable.223 load will work just fine.
Mathew 22: 37-39
Happy escapee from NY
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,166
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,166 |
Or further with a soft bullet.
Now let the schitt slinging begin.
Half the problem w small calibers is railroad spike tough bullets. This has been my experience as well
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 19,720
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 19,720 |
Why use something barely adequate (if That) when a 243 or other 6mm will do it better? It is not barely adequate. You wouldn't be able to tell the difference in a wound channel with a 223 and a 6.5 Creed, assuming good bullets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,494
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,494 |
yes, if the person pulling the trigger knows what they are doing...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,048
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,048 |
If you’ve never done it before then no, it isn’t near big enough. If you have then sure, it’ll kill deer or even bigger stuff further than the stated range and with “worse” bullets as well. At least this is what you will generally glean from answers to this type question here on the fire.
There hasn’t been a deer born I’d be afraid to shoot with a 223 at 250 yards, I wouldn’t go out of my way to use a super hard bullet either. If you can shoot a 223 can be a pretty big gun.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277 |
.223 for whitetail - yes or no? Yes. Another yes. Easily. ( You guys KNEW I would chime in...) It will blow a hole in your basic woodchuck you can stick your fist into. Put that same hole in the vitals of a deer, and start field dressing! I know this isn't exactly what the OP asked about ( a .223 at 250 yards) but its a .222 at 247 yards ( lasered) And yes...I have more than " a sample of one"... That's a pretty rifle. Is it a Remington BDL?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277 |
Yes. I'd use one way past 250, and I wouldn't use a barnes...ever Why not a Barnes?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277 |
yes, if the person pulling the trigger knows what they are doing... I've got that covered. Master classification in Service Rifle, 200-600 yards.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,208
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,208 |
Yes. Proven it too many times to myself to say other wise. Dropped a nice 9 point and a big 6 point seconds apart one evening. Those two bucks died way too quickly to say a 223 isn’t enough gun.
GreggH
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,306 |
Yes. A .223 kills way above it's pay grade.
Life is good live it while you can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,633
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,633 |
Legally culled large numbers of deer (does) over the years with a 222. We kept shots inside 100 yards and 95% of the shots were high neck. DRT on pretty much every shot.
Hornady factory 50 grain loads most of the time.
You only live once, but...if you do it right, once is enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277 |
Yes. I'd use one way past 250, and I wouldn't use a barnes...ever Why not a Barnes? They aren't needed. Just like bonded bullets aren't needed. But by all means if you want a narrow wound channel use a barnes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,879
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,879 |
Yes. I'd use one way past 250, and I wouldn't use a barnes...ever Why not a Barnes? They aren't needed. Just like bonded bullets aren't needed. But by all means if you want a narrow wound channel use a barnes. Thats good to know. I just bought a box of Barnes vor-tx 55gr tsx. After reading this I think I'll stay with the 64gr soft points
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277 |
Yes. I'd use one way past 250, and I wouldn't use a barnes...ever Why not a Barnes? They aren't needed. Just like bonded bullets aren't needed. But by all means if you want a narrow wound channel use a barnes. Thats good to know. I just bought a box of Barnes vor-tx 55gr tsx. After reading this I think I'll stay with the 64gr soft points Not saying they won't kill deer, but I would rather use the 64gr soft points if lead is legal.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,277 |
Yes. I'd use one way past 250, and I wouldn't use a barnes...ever Why not a Barnes? They aren't needed. Just like bonded bullets aren't needed. But by all means if you want a narrow wound channel use a barnes. Gotcha. I wish Hornady made the SST bullet in .223 (.224 for the picky ones). Is there another manufacturer's equivalent of the SST bullet in .223?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,519 |
yes for my 10 year old grandson for a deer , but for me for bigger bucks no i wanna a bigger cartridge always.
LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 5,277 |
Google "77gr tmk hunting"
|
|
|
403 members (257 mag, 1lesfox, 22250rem, 2500HD, 12344mag, 1lessdog, 43 invisible),
1,321
guests, and
1,065
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|