|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,611
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 19,611 |
JPro, If you're not using ASC stainless steel mags in your AR's , you might want to try one or two. They allow a COAL of 2.315" instead of the standard 2.260". LINKEd
"Not in an open forum, where truth has less value than opinions, where all opinions are equally welcome regardless of their origins, rationale, inanity, or truth, where opinions are neither of equal value nor decisive." Ken Howell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,999
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,999 |
Good inputs today. I appreciate it.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 54,527
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 54,527 |
Ladies, Understand that Beezer's Ninjaness is a fhuqking ruse and her CLUELESSNESS is simply fhuqking Magnificent. Hint. Bless her heart for trying. Fhuqking LAUGHING!.............
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193 |
I played with 8208 before while very accurate could not get the speeds. Yep, you have to push 8208 pretty hard to get 2700+ FPS, IME; ditto for AR Comp but both are good powders. You don't have to push as hard to get there with both VV-540 or 2000MR though..............never used Lever, some say it's very good too. MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193 |
My load is:
77 gr SMK w/c 24.0 gr 8208 XBR LC '12 brass CCI #41 2.250" COAL
My rifle is a 16" SS410 1:7.7" twist. I get an average velocity of 2770 fps, suppressed.
I have used other powders. Varget couldn't get me the speed. TAC got me the speed I wanted, but the ES was pretty bad and resulted in more vertical than I would tolerate at 600 yards. I gonna say that I think you're way over any pressure that I'd want to be at with that load if that's a real velocity................I can't quite get there with that load form an 18" barrel. MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193 |
Try 24.5-24.7gr of varget.. that the NM load used at camp perry.. Varget is hard to beat for pure accuracy, as long as you don't need / want top velocity attainable with other powders. MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639 |
My load is:
77 gr SMK w/c 24.0 gr 8208 XBR LC '12 brass CCI #41 2.250" COAL
My rifle is a 16" SS410 1:7.7" twist. I get an average velocity of 2770 fps, suppressed.
I have used other powders. Varget couldn't get me the speed. TAC got me the speed I wanted, but the ES was pretty bad and resulted in more vertical than I would tolerate at 600 yards. I gonna say that I think you're way over any pressure that I'd want to be at with that load if that's a real velocity................I can't quite get there with that load form an 18" barrel. MM I'm not getting any pressure signs at all. Unless both my chronos are bunk, but the drops line up with Ballistic FE. This load has been fired in several different rifles as I outlined before.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,720
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,720 |
The listed load should be on the top end but not overpressured. It’s your velocity from your 16” barrel that is higher than what everyone else is getting even from an 18” barrel. Something isn’t jiving
I don’t get 2700 fps in any 16” barrel I’ve had which includes Colt, Daniel Defense, LaRue, Noveske, Krieger, Sionics and a few others I’m forgetting.
Doesn’t matter really as long as others reading this understand they won’t get your velocities. MK262 in the original 18” Douglas SPR barrel doesn’t get your velocities and it uses a blended powder we can’t get.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 757
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 757 |
Not the 77 grain, but I tested Lever with the 75 gr. Bthps and at 26 grains was seeing 2831 fps and that did show pressure. 25 grains was showing 2699 fps with no pressure signs and this is in a 16” CLE Douglas barrel.
My 77 gr SMK load is 23.4 grains 8208 which is around 2670 fps out of that 16” barrel.
Last edited by scoony; 10/20/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639 |
The listed load should be on the top end but not overpressured. It’s your velocity from your 16” barrel that is higher than what everyone else is getting even from an 18” barrel. Something isn’t jiving
I don’t get 2700 fps in any 16” barrel I’ve had which includes Colt, Daniel Defense, LaRue, Noveske, Krieger, Sionics and a few others I’m forgetting.
Doesn’t matter really as long as others reading this understand they won’t get your velocities. MK262 in the original 18” Douglas SPR barrel doesn’t get your velocities and it uses a blended powder we can’t get. You know, next opportunity, I'll chrono out of some of my other 16" barrels to see what it does. One difference can be the actual barrel is a fast one. When one has been doing this a while, you may discover that two identical guns will get significantly different velocities with the same ammunition. I have had both fast and slow barrels. Additionally, adding a suppressor often adds velocity to a rifle, a point many here are overlooking. Pulling off the can, according to my notes, shed 30 fps on average.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,720
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,720 |
I’ve been chasing the MK262 load since it came on my radar. And yes I too have had some fast barrels, a 17” Krieger from CLE was almost as fast as my 18” Noveske, much faster than my 16” Noveske. You may have a one in a million barrel but the rest of us are not getting that velocity with 18”.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19,873
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 19,873 |
I’ve been chasing the MK262 load since it came on my radar. And yes I too have had some fast barrels, a 17” Krieger from CLE was almost as fast as my 18” Noveske, much faster than my 16” Noveske. You may have a one in a million barrel but the rest of us are not getting that velocity with 18”. I will find out next few days I loaded up his exact same load even had cci 41. Will report back, I will shoot them out of 2-16 inch (bear creek barrels) 3-18 inch (2 BA 1 green mtn) 1-20 (bison armory) over magnetospeed.
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 42,488
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 42,488 |
I’ve been chasing the MK262 load since it came on my radar. And yes I too have had some fast barrels, a 17” Krieger from CLE was almost as fast as my 18” Noveske, much faster than my 16” Noveske. You may have a one in a million barrel but the rest of us are not getting that velocity with 18”. Barrels are weird. You never know what they are going to do. I tested some loads over a chrono once with 2 of the same manufactures barrel, a Noveske and a 22" Savage bolt action. All the AR's were using 20" tubes and they were all faster than the 22" bolt action Savage. What surprised me the most was the difference in velocity between the 3 AR barrels. I would have thought the 2 from the same manufacture would have been roughly the same, but they were not. There was about a 60 fps difference from the slowest to fastest. If I remember right, my favorite rifle was the slowest, but also the most precise. Weird anomaly that I can not explain. Avg velocity of that load was 2,680 fps. That's as fast as I wanted to push the AR Comp load..
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639 |
I’ve been chasing the MK262 load since it came on my radar. And yes I too have had some fast barrels, a 17” Krieger from CLE was almost as fast as my 18” Noveske, much faster than my 16” Noveske. You may have a one in a million barrel but the rest of us are not getting that velocity with 18”. What is funny is a friend of mine bought an 18" BCM SS410 when I bought my first 16". With the suppressor my 16" was 3 FPS slower average than his 18" with the same load on the same day. Without the suppressor it was around 20 fps. I don't remember the velocity on that upper, its not in the notes on my phone, but I want to say it was 2720s. That first SS410 is long gone and wore out, and I'm now on my second one, but this time the KD4 version.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193 |
The listed load should be on the top end but not overpressured. It’s your velocity from your 16” barrel that is higher than what everyone else is getting even from an 18” barrel. Something isn’t jiving
I don’t get 2700 fps in any 16” barrel I’ve had which includes Colt, Daniel Defense, LaRue, Noveske, Krieger, Sionics and a few others I’m forgetting.
Doesn’t matter really as long as others reading this understand they won’t get your velocities. MK262 in the original 18” Douglas SPR barrel doesn’t get your velocities and it uses a blended powder we can’t get. You're right, the barrel isn't making the difference, most likely different people assessing pressure differently. I can remember with Barsness commented about the development of the 7mm STW............when they finally got around to actually measuring pressure on the developer's "magic" loads, they were WAAAAAAY over any acceptable pressure level. I strongly suspect that's the case here as I have never, in print, or reality, with over a dozen guns personally, seen anyone referencing getting that kind of velocities from that combination in a 16" barrel. Ever. MM
Last edited by MontanaMan; 10/21/22. Reason: Typo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 42,488
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 42,488 |
The listed load should be on the top end but not overpressured. It’s your velocity from your 16” barrel that is higher than what everyone else is getting even from an 18” barrel. Something isn’t jiving
I don’t get 2700 fps in any 16” barrel I’ve had which includes Colt, Daniel Defense, LaRue, Noveske, Krieger, Sionics and a few others I’m forgetting.
Doesn’t matter really as long as others reading this understand they won’t get your velocities. MK262 in the original 18” Douglas SPR barrel doesn’t get your velocities and it uses a blended powder we can’t get. You're right, the barrel is making the difference, most likely different people assessing pressure differently. I can remember with Barsness commented about the development of the 7mm STW............when they finally got around to actually measuring pressure on the developer's "magic" loads, they were WAAAAAAY over any acceptable pressure level. I strongly suspect that's the case here as I have never, in print, or reality, with over a dozen guns personally, seen anyone referencing getting that kind of velocities from that combination in a 16" barrel. Ever. MM Do you guys think it may have been a faulty chrono?
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 22,193 |
Do you guys think it may have been a faulty chrono? Hard to say.............it could. Lot's of people just never see pressure signs though.................just sayin'. All I know is that on all the forums I've been on, & all my direct experience, no one has ever referenced 24 gr of 8208 getting 2770 from a 16" barrel................& I don't either from 16" or 18" barrels; don't have anything longer. Doesn't mean it can't be done, but it does mean it's surely not an everyday occurrence. (And 23.5-24 gr of 8208 is my top load with 77's with that powder as well. I've mostly gone to VV-540 & 2000-MR instead of 8208 as I can get more velocity than with 8208 or AR Comp with the same accuracy, but 8208 is a very, very good powder for me & I like it a lot) MM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 639 |
The listed load should be on the top end but not overpressured. It’s your velocity from your 16” barrel that is higher than what everyone else is getting even from an 18” barrel. Something isn’t jiving
I don’t get 2700 fps in any 16” barrel I’ve had which includes Colt, Daniel Defense, LaRue, Noveske, Krieger, Sionics and a few others I’m forgetting.
Doesn’t matter really as long as others reading this understand they won’t get your velocities. MK262 in the original 18” Douglas SPR barrel doesn’t get your velocities and it uses a blended powder we can’t get. You're right, the barrel is making the difference, most likely different people assessing pressure differently. I can remember with Barsness commented about the development of the 7mm STW............when they finally got around to actually measuring pressure on the developer's "magic" loads, they were WAAAAAAY over any acceptable pressure level. I strongly suspect that's the case here as I have never, in print, or reality, with over a dozen guns personally, seen anyone referencing getting that kind of velocities from that combination in a 16" barrel. Ever. MM Do you guys think it may have been a faulty chrono? No. It’s not a faulty chrono. When the drop data lines up out to 1200, it’s right. Yeah, barrels can make a difference. So can chambers. Sometimes two identical barrels may have 40 fps between them. It’s just the way it is. When it comes to pressure signs, they are either there, or they aren’t. Hell, about half of ARs will shoe ejector marks with 5.56 NATO ammo. Others, not so much. Usually, 5.56 ammo loaded to the pressure will see primer pockets blown in 4 or 5 firings. Meanwhile, the real tell is a chewed up extractor groove and rim. On 2000MR I have a couple pounds. I used it and it was about the same speed as 8208, but wasn’t as tight for me. In the grand scheme of things, too much emphasis is placed on speed. 50 fps really doesn’t matter much in the grand scheme of things. Pick out the best shooting one. If it’s faster, it’s just a bonus.
"Full time night woman? I never could find no tracks on a woman's heart. I packed me a squaw for ten year, Pilgrim. Cheyenne, she were, and the meanest bitch that ever balled for beads."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,720
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,720 |
So if it’s a magic barrel then it should be magic with any ammo. Chrono some M193 and tell us what it runs.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 42,488
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 42,488 |
So if it’s a magic barrel then it should be magic with any ammo. Chrono some M193 and tell us what it runs. Makes me want to sprinkle some magic fairy dust into some 223 cases and run to the range with the chrono.. ha ha..
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
324 members (2500HD, 12344mag, 1lessdog, 257 roberts, 10Glocks, 2UP, 35 invisible),
976
guests, and
971
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|