Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire New 2A Ruling: Marijuana and Gun Possession

Federal law prohibiting controlled substance users from possessing firearms found unconstitutional, at least in Oklahoma.

It's been three hours since this was posted.

The lack of comments speak volumes about members on this forum and gun owners in general.

BTW I don't use pot in any form

I do however love my freedom and cheer any ruling affirming my rights

Thanks for this post Denton

Pardon me if the thrill is gone.

Reminds me of the Liquor stores in Texas in the 60’-70’s that sold guns too. Most of them came to be known as Saturday Night Specials.

But it doesn’t stop the gvt from prohibiting a felon from owning a gun. Depending on circumstances Marijuana charges can be a felony....

Or am I missing something?

Any 2nd Amendment win is a good one.

The problem is, even though they know it's unconstitutional, and laws keep getting struck down, the liberal gun grabbers pass new ones just as bad or worse. There's no consequences for them to do so. So it's a game of courts and appeals. Nobody really wins.

I'd love to see the NFA brought back to the constitutional accountability. SO many things are wrong about it.

And the 1968 GCA Barry?

Great News.

So, are those who have been found guilty of a crime and sent to the lockup and have served their time also still US citizens.

I don’t smoke weed, never cared for it, never took up tobacco in any form either. Marijuana is a pretty plant and smells pleasant when smoked but I also see how many teenagers get stoned out of their gourd almost daily, can’t be a good thing. Alcohol and caffeine are my regular drugs. I got a family tree littered with alcoholics yet I use it, but I’m prob’ly more addicted to caffeine than I am to alcohol, I’ve been lucky like that.

So I wasn’t inclined to comment on this as it didn’t affect me personally.

I do share the sentiment that any 2A win is a good one. Not fond of weed tho.

Since felons weren't prohibited from posessing firearms until GCA 68, I don't see how it could stand up to the historical scrutiny part of Bruen.

so druggies in western Oklahoma can now carry guns. woo hoo.

Go get another booster and go f u c k yourself.

Druggie have been carrying guns long before this decision.

Kind of like all of the criminals elsewhere in this nation that are packing even though a felon or drug user owning a gun is illegal.

How's about Chicago??

Mike,

it's not a matter of a person being stoned out of their gourds, rather that the law as written, removes a constitutionally protected right for the mere possession of any of the regulated drugs,without even need of being convicted of any criminal offense. Imagine if you will, being deprived of the right of free speech for the mere possession of un-taxed alcohol?

I don't smoke, or possess weed, and if there's a controlled substance around it's in prescription form. I think this is a good thing as it's leading back to a strict reading (interpretation) of the 2A as it was written and when it was accepted.

Actually it’s a matter of gun loving guys in Oklahoma can now smoke weed.

Typical judgemental Covtard.

Don't Bogart that joint my friend.

1791 is the key point...

I'm kind of wondering if that is Constitutional, if time has been served.

Now. If those people are not Americans, couldn't they be deported somewhere?

Boys from Oklahoma